Independent Advice for Decisions Under Scrutiny

Clients engage Lazuli where:

• Decisions involve significant capital or balance‑sheet exposure

• Internal analysis requires independent validation

• Assumptions will be questioned by boards, auditors, investors or government

• Business cases or approvals must demonstrate rigour and value for money

• Uncertainty is material and cannot be avoided

 

Typical contexts include:

• Major investments and project development

• Transactions, funding and partnerships

• Government and institutional approval processes

• Due diligence and independent review

• Prioritisation of competing options

• First‑of‑a‑kind or policy‑sensitive initiatives

 

We add the most value before commitments are irreversible.

Our work supports decisions such as:

• Whether to proceed, defer, scale or discontinue

• How risks and downside scenarios affect outcomes

• Which option represents the most credible balance of value and risk

• Whether a position is defensible under review

• How decisions can be clearly explained to boards, ministers or stakeholders

 

Analysis is only undertaken where it genuinely informs decision‑making.

Our work is routinely reviewed by boards, auditors, regulators and government agencies.

​

Accordingly, it is:

• Independent

• Evidence‑based

• Clearly documented

• Designed to withstand scrutiny

 

We are comfortable stating when the evidence does not support a preferred outcome.

​

We regularly work alongside management teams, legal advisers, accountants, engineers, financiers and government agencies.

 

Our role is to complement existing advice, helping ensure technical inputs translate into coherent, defensible decisions.

A successful engagement results in:

• Clearer understanding of trade‑offs and risks

• Greater confidence in assumptions

• Improved ability to justify decisions

• Better‑informed boards and stakeholders

 

Our role is not to make decisions — but to support better decisions.